My 2-cents on the word "Archived" is that it's a synonym for Backup/Storage, which I don't think is what this process is about.
Cheers, Paul On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > Am 2014-11-26 um 16:16 schrieb Paul Benedict: > >> This email is related to thread "Abandoned bug analysis" [1]. >> >> We have done the Great Ticket Cleanup of 2014 twice this year. It has >> really been productive for anyone who triages outstanding bugs and >> enhancements. We've been adding a note in the ticket, as a courtesy to the >> participants, and closing them as "Won't Fix". >> >> This is certainly one valid way of accomplishing the goal. However, I do >> believe we should enhance our workflow by adding an "Abandoned" (my fav) >> or >> "Archived" resolution. Why? Because "Won't Fix" is typically is used to >> close out a bug that will never be fixed (i.e., too many people rely on >> the >> bad behavior) or the enhancement is deemed worthless or incorrect. But >> more >> importantly, it's not possible to do a JIRA search and distinguish between >> these two conditions unless a new resolution is introduced. >> > > We need two new things: > > 1. Status: Awaiting Feedback (not just labels). > 2. Resolution: Archived > > Michael > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
