Retired rather than Archived? This cleanup seems like a really good idea :-)
david jencks On Nov 26, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > My 2-cents on the word "Archived" is that it's a synonym for > Backup/Storage, which I don't think is what this process is about. > > > Cheers, > Paul > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Am 2014-11-26 um 16:16 schrieb Paul Benedict: >> >>> This email is related to thread "Abandoned bug analysis" [1]. >>> >>> We have done the Great Ticket Cleanup of 2014 twice this year. It has >>> really been productive for anyone who triages outstanding bugs and >>> enhancements. We've been adding a note in the ticket, as a courtesy to the >>> participants, and closing them as "Won't Fix". >>> >>> This is certainly one valid way of accomplishing the goal. However, I do >>> believe we should enhance our workflow by adding an "Abandoned" (my fav) >>> or >>> "Archived" resolution. Why? Because "Won't Fix" is typically is used to >>> close out a bug that will never be fixed (i.e., too many people rely on >>> the >>> bad behavior) or the enhancement is deemed worthless or incorrect. But >>> more >>> importantly, it's not possible to do a JIRA search and distinguish between >>> these two conditions unless a new resolution is introduced. >>> >> >> We need two new things: >> >> 1. Status: Awaiting Feedback (not just labels). >> 2. Resolution: Archived >> >> Michael >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
