the changes are at canonical repo, ie ASF svn
see http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE-276

I suppose github mirror is a little bit behind

Regards,

Hervé

Le samedi 17 janvier 2015 09:39:16 Henning Schmiedehausen a écrit :
> As long as I can just drop in 6.2 and the plugin does not break (as it
> does today), I am fine.
> 
> We are running our own checkstyle ruleset anyway, it is just the
> default that does not work well.
> 
> Where are your changes, I haven't seen them on the trunk @ github.
> 
> -h
> 
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> 
wrote:
> > yes, i know you did that in the branch to test upgrade for a release with
> > Checkstyle 6.2 as default version
> > 
> > I did it in trunk, even without changing Checkstyle version: even if
> > maven-
> > checkstyle-plugin ships with an older Checkstyle version as default
> > dependency, end-users can now upgrade the dependency when using the plugin
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Hervé
> > 
> > Le samedi 17 janvier 2015 09:17:08 Henning Schmiedehausen a écrit :
> >> I already did that. See https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/42
> >> 
> >> -h
> >> 
> >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>
> > 
> > wrote:
> >> > Le mercredi 14 janvier 2015 11:08:40 Henning Schmiedehausen a écrit :
> >> >> The 6.2 checkstyle requires java 7 and it also removes (!) at least
> >> >> one of the checks (RedundantThrows) which is used in all shipped
> >> >> checkstyle sets and one of the integration tests. So you can no longer
> >> >> use any of the builtin styles but have to use a custom style which has
> >> >> the RedundantThrows check removed.
> >> > 
> >> > the RedundantThrows check causes a lot of false positives: it is maked
> >> > as
> >> > "ingore" in Maven parent pom
> >> > I'll remove it from default configs for next release: see
> >> > MCHECKSTYLE-276
> >> > 
> >> >> Having code that can dynamically discover whether a given check exists
> >> >> or not and change the configuration accordingly is something that
> >> >> probably would need to be done inside checkstyle proper, not the
> >> >> plugin driving it.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I have a pull request prepared (not pushed yet) which would upgrade
> >> >> checkstyle and the build to java 7 for a possible 2.16 release. One of
> >> >> the problems here is that at least one integration test will not pass
> >> >> until the patch was applied to trunk (because it remote-loads the rule
> >> >> set from the svn repo which in turn currently still has the bad rule).
> >> >> 
> >> >> It is all a mess and prolonging it to accomodate the one hold-out on
> >> >> Java 5 (which is EOLed for > 5 years now) and the few that insist on
> >> >> using Java 6 (which is EOLed for ~ 2 years) makes no sense to me. We
> >> >> should lead, not lag behind.
> >> >> 
> >> >> -h
> >> >> 
> >> >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY
> >> >> <herve.bout...@free.fr>
> >> > 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> > question: is upgrading only a question of changing dependency
> >> >> > version?
> >> >> > or
> >> >> > does it require code change?
> >> >> > and if it requires code change, can we do it with reasonable
> >> >> > reflection
> >> >> > or
> >> >> > is it really too much change?
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > because if we can let the end user upgrade his config (and better
> >> >> > document), we would get the best of every choice
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Regards,
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Hervé
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Le mardi 13 janvier 2015 19:52:35 Henning Schmiedehausen a écrit :
> >> >> >> I would pretty much abandon anything pre-Java 6 at this point and
> >> >> >> start moving towards Java 7 soon. The checkstyle plugin right now
> >> >> >> has
> >> >> >> three open releases with only the third being really useful
> >> >> >> ("upgrade
> >> >> >> to latest checkstyle") and given the previous release cadence it
> >> >> >> makes
> >> >> >> me fear that this release will not show before Mid-2015.
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> -h
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Dennis Lundberg
> >> >> >> <denn...@apache.org>
> >> > 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> > I've started going through the open issues and have found a
> >> >> >> > problem
> >> >> >> > that I need som help with. It turns out that Checkstyle 5.9 uses
> >> >> >> > Java
> >> >> >> > 6 classes, even though it is not mentioned in the release notes.
> >> >> >> > How
> >> >> >> > do we want to handle this? I see two possible options:
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > 1. Make version 2.14 of the plugin require Java 6, and update it
> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> > use the latest available version of Checkstyle that runs on Java
> >> >> >> > 6.
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > 2. Revert the plugin back to Checkstyle 5.8 and release 2.14 of
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > plugin with a Java 5 requirement. After that release 2.15 of the
> >> >> >> > plugin fairly straight away with a Java 6 requirement, and using
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > latest available version of Checkstyle that runs on Java 6. It
> >> >> >> > should
> >> >> >> > be noted that Checkstyle 5.8 does NOT work on Java 8 source code.
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > Perhaps there are other alternatives? What do you think?
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Dennis Lundberg
> >> >> >> > <denn...@apache.org>
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> I'd like to release version 2.14 of Maven Checkstyle Plugin. The
> >> >> >> >> main
> >> >> >> >> motive for 2.14 is the ability to check Java 8 source code.
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> According to the road map there are 5 unresolved issues
> >> >> >> >> scheduled
> >> >> >> >> for
> >> >> >> >> 2.14.
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHECKSTYLE#selectedTab=com.atl
> >> >> >> >> ass
> >> >> >> >> ian
> >> >> >> >> .ji
> >> >> >> >> ra.plugin.system.project%3Aroadmap-panel
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> If anyone is interested in fixing one or more of these for 2.14
> >> >> >> >> now
> >> >> >> >> would be a good time to do it. Just reply here with an estimated
> >> >> >> >> time
> >> >> >> >> frame. If noone has the time for this now, I'll reschedule those
> >> >> >> >> issues for 2.15, which will require Java 6.
> >> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> Dennis Lundberg
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > Dennis Lundberg
> >> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> > ---
> >> >> >> > -
> >> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> >> >> 
> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> > -
> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> >> 
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> > 
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> 
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to