Awesome, thanks!

On Feb 25, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Andreas Gudian <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> I'm stuck with a windows box and I can give it a try...
> 
> .bat-scripting is not really a joy, but what's in the patch should be
> translatable.
> 
> Andreas
> 
> 2015-02-25 17:01 GMT+01:00 Igor Fedorenko <[email protected]>:
> 
>> You can see actual diff to mvn shell script in [1], but the changes was
>> basically two-fold. First, find nearest parent directory that contains
>> .mvn/ subdirectory. This parent is considered "true" multi-module
>> project root (MNG-1958). Second, if .mvn/java.config file is present
>> immediately under the true multimodule project root, use its content as
>> java invocation parameters, i.e. similar to $MAVEN_OPTS environment
>> variable.
>> 
>> I don't know enough about Windows scripting to make similar change to
>> mvn.bat and mvnDebug.bat batch files.
>> 
>> [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=commit;h=
>> 8ed9a1caa8890773b45c6c408a4e40acf4f4b0fd
>> 
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Igor
>> 
>> 
>> On 2015-02-25 9:56, Robert Patrick wrote:
>> 
>>> What exactly is the problem that Igor ran into that limits his solution
>>> to Unix-only?  Knowing this would help people determine what the level of
>>> effort needed to solve the problem.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Robert Patrick <[email protected]>
>>> VP, Oracle Corporation
>>> 7460 Warren Pkwy, Ste. 300      Office: +1.972.963.2872
>>> Frisco, TX 75034, USA           Mobile: +1.469.556.9450
>>> 
>>> Professional Oracle WebLogic Server
>>> by Robert Patrick, Gregory Nyberg, and Philip Aston
>>> with Josh Bregman and Paul Done
>>> Book Home Page: http://www.wrox.com/
>>> Kindle Version: http://www.amazon.com/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:40 AM
>>> To: Maven Developers List
>>> Subject: Re: Maven 3.2.6
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Feb 24, 2015, at 11:31 PM, Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I had a quick look at the changeling and I'm +1 for a 3.3.0 with
>>>> improvements like the toolchain integration and few others I'm far
>>>> from the project and won't veto anything as I have no time for it but
>>>> I don't understand why http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5767 was
>>>> integrated without a windows support ? For me it is everything or
>>>> nothing.
>>>> Noone could help Igor on this ?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> It would be great if someone would help, but it is still a step forward.
>>> For projects that require this and document specific requirements it will
>>> just work for non-Windows users. Say the project needs 8gb to run
>>> correctly: in most cases no one reads the documentation they run the build
>>> and it fails. Then they go read something and figure it out and it works.
>>> We've at least made it work for some people. If there isn't a single Maven
>>> committer who uses Windows who can add the same capabilities or we can't
>>> find a contributor I don't think it should stop the feature for going in
>>> for the people it can benefit.
>>> 
>>> Igor and I don't use Windows regularly, don't know Windows, don't want to
>>> know Windows and none of our customers use Windows.
>>> 
>>> It's overall a net improvement. For me it's a about gradual improvement.
>>> But I've asked on Twitter if there are any Windows users that can help.
>>> 
>>> Many months/years ago the integration of colors in logs output was
>>>> rejected in a part because we wasn't confident in the windows support ...
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I don't think that was the issue. The issue was us not being able the
>>> decide on an underlying logging framework. I've seen JANSI working fine on
>>> Windows for years.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> My 2 cents.
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 25 Feb 2015, at 4:06, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> based on the list of changes i would suggest to make a 3.3.0 instead
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 3.2.6....to make clear something is introduced....
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1 on 3.3.0 here. Bring on the changes!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mark
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Mark Derricutt
>>>>> http://www.theoryinpractice.net
>>>>> http://www.chaliceofblood.net
>>>>> http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt
>>>>> http://twitter.com/talios
>>>>> http://facebook.com/mderricutt
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> -----
>>>> Arnaud Héritier
>>>> http://aheritier.net
>>>> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Jason
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>> Jason van Zyl
>>> Founder, Takari and Apache Maven
>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
>>> http://twitter.com/takari_io
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> People develop abstractions by generalizing from concrete examples.
>>> Every attempt to determine the correct abstraction on paper without
>>> actually developing a running system is doomed to failure. No one is that
>>> smart. A framework is a resuable design, so you develop it by looking at
>>> the things it is supposed to be a design of. The more examples you look at,
>>> the more general your framework will be.
>>> 
>>>   -- Ralph Johnson & Don Roberts, Patterns for Evolving Frameworks
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional
>>> commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Takari and Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
http://twitter.com/takari_io
---------------------------------------------------------

Lastly, "Impossible." The lamest of the lame excuses! Difficult maybe, or 
impractical, or too expensive, but rarely is anything impossible.

  -- Yvon Chouinard, Let my People Go Surfing













---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to