I also only have 4 failing ITs to fix wrt removing the deprecated goals.
One heck of a job though...

K
18. jul. 2015 1.33 a.m. skrev "Hervé BOUTEMY" <[email protected]>:

> after investigation (everything is described in details in MASSEMBLY-777),
> these exclusions were necessary when using File based filtering, creating
> temporary files with extensions
>
> but Kristian fixed the filtering by switching from File based filtering to
> Reader
> based filtering for maven-assembly-plugin 2.5.1
>
> Thank you Kristian :)
>
> I then removed the exclusions without any fear: now unused hack
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 14 juillet 2015 18:11:59 Sander Verhagen a écrit :
> > Interesting, the commit for "**/*.filtered" says: "Based on patch
> > provided...". But the patch does NOT exclude the .filtered, while the
> > commit does. That makes it a very unclear whether the .filtered was
> > actually so much related to MASSEMBLY-154. The unit test (change) does
> also
> > not address this detail of the code change. I could see how this is all
> > *so* sketchy that you'd just want to get rid of it. If you choose to keep
> > it, you could change it from an undocumented feature into a documented
> > feature, easy enough, though :)
>
> >
> >
> > Sander Verhagen
> > [  [email protected]  ]
> >
> > NOTICE: my e-mail address has changed. Please remove [email protected]
> now
> > and start using [email protected] from now on. Please update
> your
> > address book. Thank  you!
>
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:53
> > > To: Maven Developers List
> > > Subject: Re: Intend to release maven-assembly-plugin 3.0.0
> > >
> > > blame done and found the inital commit for the 2 excludes:
> > > see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-777
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Hervé
> > >
> > > Le mardi 14 juillet 2015 17:19:30 Sander Verhagen a écrit :
> > >
> > > > I'm not much of a stakeholder in this but after following the
> > > > discussion I'm getting curious if there's any hints to why this was
> > > > introduced? Is there a VCS "blame" to do that links to a JIRA issue
> of
> > > > some kind? This could uncover at least a few (reasonable or not) use
> > > > cases for this (admitted, seemingly strange) micro-behavior.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sander Verhagen
> > > > [  [email protected]  ]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > NOTICE: my e-mail address has changed. Please remove
> > > > [email protected] now and start using [email protected]
> > >
> > > from
> > >
> > > > now on. Please update your address book. Thank  you!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Benson Margulies [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:05
> > > > > To: Maven Developers List
> > > > > Subject: Re: Intend to release maven-assembly-plugin 3.0.0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > If it’s easy to make compatible why would you not do it?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Really, this is the only interesting point of disagreement here.
> > > > > It's easy for
> > >
> > >  _me_ to make it compatible. It's hard for readers of the assembly
> > >
> > > > > descriptor documentation to digest and understand yet another
> option
> > > > > that tweaks yet another micro-behavior. One user out of 10,000
> might
> > > > > be disturbed by the arrival of a foo.filtered file. 9,999 users out
> > > > > of
> > > > > 10,000 will have to wade through the extra doc. And some unknown
> > > > > number of people will run into the (to me) bizarre current
> behavior.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For
> > > > > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>

Reply via email to