OK, will do.
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Benson, > > just update the branch. I have checked in a fix for that... > > You need simply to define Java 6 as target/source otherwise the parent will > control that which is there by default 1.5... > > I would suggest to make 2.6.0 which identifies as JDK > 6...requirement....3.0.0 should be reserved for Maven 3.0+ plugins... > > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > On 10/4/15 11:41 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> What can I do to help move the 3.0 effort along? >> >> Or, alternatively, what would it take to get a consensus to move to >> Java 1.6 for m-a-p 2.6? >> >> I'm stuck on... >> >> The version of plexus I need to get the feature I want requires 1.6, >> and the existing code is insisting on 1.5. >> >> [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce >> (enforce-bytecode-version) @ maven-assembly-plugin --- >> [INFO] Restricted to JDK 1.5 yet >> org.iq80.snappy:snappy:jar:0.3:compile contains >> org/iq80/snappy/BufferRecycler.class targeted to JDK 1.6 >> [INFO] Restricted to JDK 1.5 yet >> org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver:jar:3.0.1:compile contains >> org/codehaus/plexus/archiver/UnixStat.class targeted to JDK 1.6 >> [WARNING] Rule 0: >> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.EnforceBytecodeVersion failed with >> message: >> Found Banned Dependency: org.iq80.snappy:snappy:jar:0.3 >> Found Banned Dependency: org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver:jar:3.0.1 >> Use 'mvn dependency:tree' to locate the source of the banned dependencies. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 4, 2015 4:08 PM, "Dennis Lundberg" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> From what I have read we need to move all of maven-plugins to git in >>>> one >>>> go. >>>> See the thread "Full migration to Git" for more info >>> >>> >>> >>> I guess I'll have to go tune into that thread. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-10-04 14:07 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> OK, then, I want to move it to git first. Any objections? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/4/15 10:58 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hmm, I see we tried to start with a 3.0.0 version, so not on the >>>>>>> trunk. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Assembly is far from ready as M3-only, so I suggest branching the >>>>>>> latest >>>>>>> tag. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes that's the way to make a fix release... >>>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards >>>>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>> Robert >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Op Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:26:18 +0200 schreef Benson Margulies >>>>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Could we do this? I'm waiting on the 'snappy' support. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dennis Lundberg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
