On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Personally I'd release 3.0.0 and stuff whatever nit-picky requirements
> are not met. Revert any changes that depends on code that is not yet
> ready for release. I think ultimately the large list of requirements
> is a nice way to just halt all progress.
>
> It'll be at least a jdk 1.6 release no matter what.

My aim is to have the minimum of controversy here. If Robert and the
other laborers on the trunk hate your idea, I'll stick with my idea.
I'd just like to do _something_ this week.


>
> Kristian
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2015-10-05 2:47 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies <[email protected]>:
>> I have my itch scratched on the 2.6 branch. If anyone else wants to
>> pull something else onto the branch before I release 2.6.0, please
>> speak up.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> OK, will do.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Benson,
>>>>
>>>> just update the branch. I have checked in a fix for that...
>>>>
>>>> You need simply to define Java 6 as target/source otherwise the parent will
>>>> control that which is there by default 1.5...
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest to make 2.6.0 which identifies as JDK
>>>> 6...requirement....3.0.0 should be reserved for Maven 3.0+ plugins...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards
>>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>>>> On 10/4/15 11:41 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What can I do to help move the 3.0 effort along?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or, alternatively, what would it take to get a consensus to move to
>>>>> Java 1.6 for m-a-p 2.6?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm stuck on...
>>>>>
>>>>> The version of plexus I need to get the feature I want requires 1.6,
>>>>> and the existing code is insisting on 1.5.
>>>>>
>>>>> [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce
>>>>> (enforce-bytecode-version) @ maven-assembly-plugin ---
>>>>> [INFO] Restricted to JDK 1.5 yet
>>>>> org.iq80.snappy:snappy:jar:0.3:compile contains
>>>>> org/iq80/snappy/BufferRecycler.class targeted to JDK 1.6
>>>>> [INFO] Restricted to JDK 1.5 yet
>>>>> org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver:jar:3.0.1:compile contains
>>>>> org/codehaus/plexus/archiver/UnixStat.class targeted to JDK 1.6
>>>>> [WARNING] Rule 0:
>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.EnforceBytecodeVersion failed with
>>>>> message:
>>>>> Found Banned Dependency: org.iq80.snappy:snappy:jar:0.3
>>>>> Found Banned Dependency: org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-archiver:jar:3.0.1
>>>>> Use 'mvn dependency:tree' to locate the source of the banned dependencies.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 4, 2015 4:08 PM, "Dennis Lundberg" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  From what I have read we need to move all of maven-plugins to git in
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>> go.
>>>>>>> See the thread "Full migration to Git" for more info
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess I'll have to go tune into that thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2015-10-04 14:07 GMT+02:00 Benson Margulies <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, then, I want to move it to git first. Any objections?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/15 10:58 AM, Robert Scholte wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hmm, I see we tried to start with a 3.0.0 version, so not on the
>>>>>>>>>> trunk.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Assembly is far from ready as M3-only, so I suggest branching the
>>>>>>>>>> latest
>>>>>>>>>> tag.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes that's the way to make a fix release...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>>>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Op Fri, 02 Oct 2015 13:26:18 +0200 schreef Benson Margulies
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Could we do this? I'm waiting on the 'snappy' support.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dennis Lundberg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to