Olivier, if you refer to the slf4j-gossip branch, that IMHO Jason's PR supersedes it. Will drop that branch.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 8:38 AM Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > well I think this color stuff has already been done differently but never > accepted...... > > On 2 June 2016 at 16:28, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote: > > > another feature that would be great for this release: > > https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/81 > > > > I still didn't have time to work on it, but I like the screenshot > > The only thing that I'd like to check is: is tty detection working? ie > does > > color automatically disappear if there is no tty? > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le jeudi 2 juin 2016 08:23:57 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > > > +1 > > > this is something that was often seen: this is great that it is fixed! > > > > > > For example, the last time I published Maven core site, the build > simply > > > failed because of PermgenSpace: now it is working like a charm... > > > > > > This release will be a must! > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > Le mercredi 1 juin 2016 20:12:33 Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > > > > Hi Manfred, > > > > > > > > On 6/1/16 12:24 AM, Manfred Moser wrote: > > > > > I can feel your excitement coming through in the emails.. ;-) > > > > > > > > Of course I'm excited ;-) > > > > > > > > ...cause it's very important...I have had heard many customers saying > > > > they will not upgrade to newer versions of Maven exactly based on > such > > > > issue(s)... > > > > > > > > which is in general bad ... > > > > > > > > > > > > This will break their argument ;-)... > > > > > > > > > Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote on 2016-05-31 15:14: > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> > > > > >> tested without the patch (-Xmx6g) ...run time for the test project > > more > > > > >> than two 2 Minutes.... > > > > >> > > > > >> running with the patch (-Xmx1g): > > > > >> > > > > >> Run time ca. 27 seconds... > > > > >> > > > > >> also worked with -Xmx768m ...ca. 30 seconds... > > > > >> > > > > >> so looks very good... > > > > >> > > > > >> Let us wait what the IT's say... > > > > >> > > > > >> Kind regards > > > > >> Karl Heinz Marbaise > > > > >> > > > > >> On 5/31/16 10:49 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > > > > >>> Hi, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> after more investigation and an extremly good tip of > Andriy...(see > > > > >>> MNG-6030) and in the end the solution: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Using test project with 5000 modules just doing: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> mvn clean > > > > >>> > > > > >>> using the patch now in master > > > > >>> (41144e7ecf52e7ec3850f3e78d81f42f505f4af8) > > > > >>> extremely reduces the memory footprint... > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-test-project-generator/blob/master > > > > >>> /M > > > > >>> aven340-with-patch-5000.png > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> This shows the result using the patch > > > > >>> > > > > >>> The following shows Maven 3.3.9: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-test-project-generator/blob/master > > > > >>> /M > > > > >>> aven339-5000.png > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Many thanks to Andriy for the support and help... > > > > >>> > > > > >>> we will see if not IT's will fail on the change. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Kind regards > > > > >>> Karl Heinz Marbaise > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On 4/22/16 9:49 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > > > > >>>> Hi, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> i started a little bit more detailed analysis.. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> very simple via JConsole and running the different versions... > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I have summarized this here: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-test-project-generator > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Kind regards > > > > >>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On 4/17/16 5:50 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > > > > >>>>> Hi to all, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> i have a question concerning the memory consumption... > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> If i run maven with the same JDK and the same reactor and build > > with > > > > >>>>> the > > > > >>>>> same parameter and plugins... > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> will the printout at the end of the build (Final Memory) > > something > > > > >>>>> realiable about the consumption of the JVM during the build > > ?...Or > > > > >>>>> is > > > > >>>>> it > > > > >>>>> at least a hint...or would i need to do something different > (BTW: > > > > >>>>> Someone has a hint about that?) ... > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > > > > >>>>> [INFO] > > > > >>>>> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > >>>>> [INFO] Total time: 6.431 s > > > > >>>>> [INFO] Finished at: 2016-04-17T17:46:58+02:00 > > > > >>>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 47M/638M > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> So if i ran the same build with different Maven versions so > could > > > > >>>>> this > > > > >>>>> give us a hint where more memory is consumed ...(to identify > > where > > > > >>>>> and > > > > >>>>> why is a different story)... > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Kind regards > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >
