Re: parallelise not overlapping tasks

[Mickael Istria]

I think there is a difference between scheduling tasks (one is after the
other) and assuming that 2 tasks that are ready can run in parallel.
Adding scheduling data would be helpful and get rid of the concept of
phases, for sure; but we also -and more importantly- need the existing
mojos to be audited and be able to declare whether they're thread-safe
before running them in parallel, and this sounds like a gigantic work.