Mojos already have the ability to say if they are threadsafe, what do you see missing?
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le jeu. 6 déc. 2018 à 15:23, Mickael Istria <mist...@redhat.com> a écrit : > I think there is a difference between scheduling tasks (one is after the > other) and assuming that 2 tasks that are ready can run in parallel. > Adding scheduling data would be helpful and get rid of the concept of > phases, for sure; but we also -and more importantly- need the existing > mojos to be audited and be able to declare whether they're thread-safe > before running them in parallel, and this sounds like a gigantic work. >
