Howdy,

I am pretty much convinced it can do all that site is able to do.
Let's see the jaxen conversion result once done.

Also, this would not push anything, I always wrote (at least intended to)
"static site tool is left at discretion of user", I just mentioned JBake as
something that can buy out functionality of the maven-site-plugin, that's
all.

T

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:25 PM Benjamin Marwell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Please do NOT consider jbake.
> We (shiro team) ported the page to jbake, and it is really a mess.
> Many things are not supported which can easily be done in other static
> site generators.
> There is absolutely no progress. No java.time support. JSON/YAML
> support is broken and needs a lot of workarounds.
>
> Look at the repo and build it yourself -- the amount of javadoc will
> take very long to process.
> https://github.com/apache/shiro-site
>
>
> Am Mi., 16. Nov. 2022 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Tamás Cservenák
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I am pretty much sure your site could be pretty much "transported" to use
> > jbake-maven-plugin instead of maven-site-plugin.
> >
> > I am aware of the long history of the Maven project, being here since
> 2006,
> > but still...
> > I don't think what I propose is "build a lamborghini instead of a ford
> > pickup".
> >
> > I see it more like "let's replace the ford battery, but given how old it
> > is, we have
> > only aftermarket parts for it".
> >
> > Now that you have shown your site, let me try to de-site it, just as an
> > experiment...
> > as I never tried this before....
> >
> > Will do it here
> > https://github.com/cstamas/jaxen
> >
> > Thanks
> > T
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 1:08 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I like some parts of this. I don't agree with others. I agree that
> > > maven site isn't competitive with other site builders, but that was
> > > never really its purpose. I think it's OK for generating  a site for a
> > > Maven project. I wouldn't expect it to be used for anything else. As a
> > > maintainer of one such site <http://www.cafeconleche.org/jaxen/> it
> > > would be very inconvenient for me if this plugin disappeared or
> > > changed in a major way.
> > >
> > > The old site design just works. We don't need so-called modern,
> > > responsive sites. For our purposes — documenting code — the 20 year
> > > old classic HTML we use is just fine. In fact, I'd say it's superior
> > > to modern designs as implemented in practice.
> > >
> > > I do wish Maven hadn't gone its own way with NIH components like
> > > Plexus, APT, and Doxia that are all essentially used today by maven
> > > and no one else. However in fairness this all happened twenty years
> > > ago when alternatives that have become de facto standards was not
> > > obviously better or simply did not exist. We should modernize our
> > > dependencies where possible, but I don't think a rewrite is worth the
> > > effort and I would oppose anything that broke existing sites, links,
> > > and workflows.
> > >
> > > When counting "wasted engineering hours spent on it", these are at
> > > least a couple of orders of magnitude lower than would be spent on a
> > > radical replacement of the sort being proposed. It's like proposing we
> > > build a new Lamborghini to save the money we spend on oil changes for
> > > our 2002 Ford pickup. Of course this is open source, so if anyone has
> > > the time and money to spend  on an alternative site plugin that
> > > scratches their itch, by all means they can do it. However this should
> > > be a new plugin projects can adopt or not at a time that's convenient
> > > for them. It should not replace the existing plugin so many projects
> > > already use.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 5:19 AM Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Howdy,
> > > >
> > > > This is really just a brainstorming thread I'd like to spin,
> regarding
> > > > Maven Site stuff.
> > > >
> > > > Again, the message is in wiki
> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Quo+Vadis+Maven+Site
> > > >
> > > > But I would like to make discussion happen here on dev ML.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > T
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Elliotte Rusty Harold
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to