Howdy, Yes, that's right, the "bootstrap" effort is not the same, true.
But otherwise, for example build execution time wise (this minimal project site:site for me runs almost 2 minute, plus artifact build and testing is about 26 sec = 2+ minutes) does a lot: it has everything in one pass (artifacts built, tested and site built) in 36 seconds. HTH T On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 1:07 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for demo'ing. What this shows me is that the initial effort to > create a site in this fashion is vastly greater than with the > maven-site-plugin. A lot of content that maven-site generates by > default has to be manually created to make it work with a static site > generator. For my workflow, the extra development cost far outweighs > the build time improvements. > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:14 PM Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Howdy, > > > > So, here is "stage No1" that pretty much already delivers what existing > > site had: > > https://github.com/jaxen-xpath/jaxen/pull/145 > > > > Point is: before, it was two runs to build and site (and took a total of > 2 > > minutes), while now it is 10 seconds more than "build artifacts" (35 > sec). > > > > To build it: mvn clean install -P site > > > > Just to clear up: I am NOT promoting JBake nor any other static site > > generator, this was just an exercise to see if we can do simple maven > sites > > without site plugin. > > > > HTH > > T > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:28 PM Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Howdy, > > > > > > I am pretty much convinced it can do all that site is able to do. > > > Let's see the jaxen conversion result once done. > > > > > > Also, this would not push anything, I always wrote (at least intended > to) > > > "static site tool is left at discretion of user", I just mentioned > JBake as > > > something that can buy out functionality of the maven-site-plugin, > that's > > > all. > > > > > > T > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:25 PM Benjamin Marwell <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Please do NOT consider jbake. > > >> We (shiro team) ported the page to jbake, and it is really a mess. > > >> Many things are not supported which can easily be done in other static > > >> site generators. > > >> There is absolutely no progress. No java.time support. JSON/YAML > > >> support is broken and needs a lot of workarounds. > > >> > > >> Look at the repo and build it yourself -- the amount of javadoc will > > >> take very long to process. > > >> https://github.com/apache/shiro-site > > >> > > >> > > >> Am Mi., 16. Nov. 2022 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Tamás Cservenák > > >> <[email protected]>: > > >> > > > >> > Howdy, > > >> > > > >> > I am pretty much sure your site could be pretty much "transported" > to > > >> use > > >> > jbake-maven-plugin instead of maven-site-plugin. > > >> > > > >> > I am aware of the long history of the Maven project, being here > since > > >> 2006, > > >> > but still... > > >> > I don't think what I propose is "build a lamborghini instead of a > ford > > >> > pickup". > > >> > > > >> > I see it more like "let's replace the ford battery, but given how > old it > > >> > is, we have > > >> > only aftermarket parts for it". > > >> > > > >> > Now that you have shown your site, let me try to de-site it, just > as an > > >> > experiment... > > >> > as I never tried this before.... > > >> > > > >> > Will do it here > > >> > https://github.com/cstamas/jaxen > > >> > > > >> > Thanks > > >> > T > > >> > > > >> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 1:08 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > I like some parts of this. I don't agree with others. I agree that > > >> > > maven site isn't competitive with other site builders, but that > was > > >> > > never really its purpose. I think it's OK for generating a site > for a > > >> > > Maven project. I wouldn't expect it to be used for anything else. > As a > > >> > > maintainer of one such site <http://www.cafeconleche.org/jaxen/> > it > > >> > > would be very inconvenient for me if this plugin disappeared or > > >> > > changed in a major way. > > >> > > > > >> > > The old site design just works. We don't need so-called modern, > > >> > > responsive sites. For our purposes — documenting code — the 20 > year > > >> > > old classic HTML we use is just fine. In fact, I'd say it's > superior > > >> > > to modern designs as implemented in practice. > > >> > > > > >> > > I do wish Maven hadn't gone its own way with NIH components like > > >> > > Plexus, APT, and Doxia that are all essentially used today by > maven > > >> > > and no one else. However in fairness this all happened twenty > years > > >> > > ago when alternatives that have become de facto standards was not > > >> > > obviously better or simply did not exist. We should modernize our > > >> > > dependencies where possible, but I don't think a rewrite is worth > the > > >> > > effort and I would oppose anything that broke existing sites, > links, > > >> > > and workflows. > > >> > > > > >> > > When counting "wasted engineering hours spent on it", these are at > > >> > > least a couple of orders of magnitude lower than would be spent > on a > > >> > > radical replacement of the sort being proposed. It's like > proposing we > > >> > > build a new Lamborghini to save the money we spend on oil changes > for > > >> > > our 2002 Ford pickup. Of course this is open source, so if anyone > has > > >> > > the time and money to spend on an alternative site plugin that > > >> > > scratches their itch, by all means they can do it. However this > should > > >> > > be a new plugin projects can adopt or not at a time that's > convenient > > >> > > for them. It should not replace the existing plugin so many > projects > > >> > > already use. > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 5:19 AM Tamás Cservenák < > [email protected]> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Howdy, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > This is really just a brainstorming thread I'd like to spin, > > >> regarding > > >> > > > Maven Site stuff. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Again, the message is in wiki > > >> > > > > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Quo+Vadis+Maven+Site > > >> > > > > > >> > > > But I would like to make discussion happen here on dev ML. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks > > >> > > > T > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Elliotte Rusty Harold > > >> > > [email protected] > > >> > > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > >> > > > > -- > Elliotte Rusty Harold > [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
