Le vendredi 18 novembre 2022, 07:57:59 CET Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> some my thoughts
> - site looks can be changed be skins - so can be more modern
yes
it seems people don't understand the menu generation with it's "decoration 
model", then we don't see many people doing more skins

Having graphic people being able to do skins would be awesome, that's one of 
the benefits I see in Tamas proposal: I still need to understand how the other 
static generation tools manage the menu creation and overall "decoration" of 
the main content of a page

> - long time on build site is caused by multiple executing the same Maven
> phase for many reports [1]
true
thinking at "why": because the maven-site-plugin does the report goals 
invocation, it's not Maven core
that's one of the reasons why I love Tamas idea about having Maven generate 
"*-reports.jar" then the new site rending process just rendering to HTML

I don't like some words of Tamas on the topic, but there are also very good 
ideas that could halp a better new site generation architecture :)

> - some reports, like tests result, static code analize is not usable for
> static documentation - such reports should be generated by CI nowadays
as you know, I disagree: it is usable for some use cases, which are not the 
use cases you are interested in

> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHARED-1044
> 
> śr., 16 lis 2022 o 11:19 Tamás Cservenák <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> > Howdy,
> > 
> > This is really just a brainstorming thread I'd like to spin, regarding
> > Maven Site stuff.
> > 
> > Again, the message is in wiki
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Quo+Vadis+Maven+Site
> > 
> > But I would like to make discussion happen here on dev ML.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > T





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to