On 2023/05/31 10:03:34 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Le mer. 31 mai 2023 à 11:21, Michael Osipov <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> > > I think with those improvements, requiring JDK 17 for master should be
> > > doable.  Any concerns of suggestions ?
> >
> > I am against this. There are enough people who cannot move to Java 17 for
> > a plethora of reasons regardless of Toolchains support. We provide a low
> > level tool and it should have a low barrier to use. Maven 4 should be used
> > as a transitional version to 5 to cut old ties and solve many issues --
> > even if we are in alpha phase now.
> > I bet many people will stick for 3.9.x or even 3.8.x for the years to come.
> >
> 
> I don't get the argument here.  If people can stick with old versions of
> maven, this is actually an argument for moving the next releases forward,
> because that won't be a problem for them.

If Maven 4 will be the only option for them since 3.x won't be maintained 
anymore then this is a problem for many. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to