Sorry, same thing as before. I was in changes mode, but I really meant
release.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 3:53 PM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Little glitches in rc2 release process
> 
> 
> Brett,
> 
> What's the relationship with the changes plugin?
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 03 May 2004 01:20
> > To: 'Maven Developers List'
> > Subject: RE: Little glitches in rc2 release process
> > 
> > File a bug against the changes plugin.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 12:10 AM
> > > To: 'Maven Developers List'
> > > Subject: RE: Little glitches in rc2 release process
> > >
> > >
> > > Here's another one:
> > >
> > > - The <versions> element has been moved to the end of the 
> > > project.xml which is not the correct place (it should be after 
> > > <repository>
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > -Vincent
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: 01 May 2004 12:25
> > > > To: 'Maven Developers List'
> > > > Subject: Little glitches in rc2 release process
> > > >
> > > > Hi Brett,
> > > >
> > > > I think I've found some little glitches in the release process
> we've
> > > used
> > > > for rc2. This is just a heads up so that we can improve the
> process
> > > for
> > > > rc3.
> > > >
> > > > - in several plugins there are wrong <version> tags. 
> Here's what I 
> > > > typically find:
> > > >
> > > >     <version>
> > > >       <id>1.1</id>
> > > >       <name>1.1</name>
> > > >       <tag>HEAD</tag>
> > > >     </version>
> > > >     <version>
> > > >       <id>1.1</id>
> > > >       <name>1.1</name>
> > > >       <tag>MAVEN_ASPECTWERKZ_1_1</tag>
> > > >     </version>
> > > >
> > > > Whereas it should be:
> > > >
> > > >     <version>
> > > >       <id>1.1</id>
> > > >       <name>1.1</name>
> > > >       <tag>MAVEN_ASPECTWERKZ_1_1</tag>
> > > >     </version>
> > > >     <version>
> > > >       <id>1.2</id>
> > > >       <name>1.2</name>
> > > >       <tag>HEAD</tag>
> > > >     </version>
> > > >
> > > > - It's missing the download link for the new version in
> > > navigation.xml.
> > > > For example, for the 1.1 release of aspectwerkz plugin:
> > > >
> > > >     <menu name="Downloads">
> > > >       <item name="AspectWerkz plugin 1.0"
> > > >
> > > href="http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/maven/plugins/maven-aspectw
> > > erkz-plugi
> > > n-
> > > > 1.0.jar"/>
> > > >     </menu>
> > > >
> > > > whereas it should have been:
> > > >
> > > >     <menu name="Downloads">
> > > >       <item name="AspectWerkz plugin 1.0"
> > > >
> > > href="http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/maven/plugins/maven-aspectw
> > > erkz-plugi
> > > n-
> > > > 1.0.jar"/>
> > > >       <item name="AspectWerkz plugin 1.1"
> > > >
> > > href="http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/maven/plugins/maven-aspectw
> > > erkz-plugi
> > > n-
> > > > 1.1.jar"/>
> > > >     </menu>
> > > >
> > > > - Sometimes, the new versions have not been created in the JIRA
> > > project.
> > > > Say I'm releasing version 1.1. We need to add a new 1.2 
> version to
> > > that
> > > > JIRA project.
> > > >
> > > > - Of course, I really don't like the modifications to 
> changes.xml
> > > where
> > > > the lines are not wrapped and all <action> are on one line. It
> makes
> > > it
> > > > very difficult to read :-) It has also wrecked all my careful
> > > indentations
> > > > that I had set over the past 2 years on all the plugins I was
> > > managing...
> > > > :-(
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > -Vincent
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to