+1 while it stays forwarded to the list (dev@ only I guess) and we close jira projects to avoid 2 sources of truth (side effect being to update sites to reflect that project by project)
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 22 oct. 2024 à 17:56, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net> a écrit : > +1 for moving to GH issues > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 4:53 PM Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > I'd like to start discussing opening (and eventually slowly switching) > from > > JIRA to GitHub issues. > > > > JIRA is a bit of a pain to use, even though we have some automatic links > > done with PRs and such. Accounts need to be authorized to maintain the > > number of external accounts low enough within the ASF, whereas this would > > only require a GitHub account. > > Release notes can be published on GitHub very easily, so the only thing > is > > that we have the whole history and list of opened issues, but I just see > > new issues being created on GitHub and handling both sources for some > time, > > gradually moving to GitHub issues only. > > > > I also think we could benefit from GitHub discussions. Those can be > backed > > by the mailing list very easily (just by configuration) and that would be > > easier to link to issues, PRs and more integrated into GitHub, with > > markdown support, etc.... See > > https://github.com/apache/opendal/discussions/5211 for example. > > > > Thoughts ? > > -- > > ------------------------ > > Guillaume Nodet > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
