I'm also +1 on this way forward.

Le jeu. 12 déc. 2024 à 10:58, Slawomir Jaranowski <s.jaranow...@gmail.com>
a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 10:15, Christoph Läubrich <m...@laeubi-soft.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > I just wanted to note with Eclipse moved form Bugzilla > Github it was
> > done the following way:
> >
> > 1. We have had a script adding a comment to each open issue in Bugzilla
> > like this [1]
> > 2. Then each developer that finds an issue important enough has migrated
> > it manually with a link to the old.
>
> This is also my favorite way :-)
> - enable GitHub Issues in project
> - we can add a comment to open issues by bulk operation in jira
> - disable creating new issues in jira
> - do it project by project ...
>
> > 3. Close the the Bugzilla with a link to github
> >
> > This was actually a good thing, as a lot of old stuff no one cared
> > anymore about is not ported to github, and still people can see the
> > "link" for relevant discussions and if anyone wants to pickup it can be
> > done anytime later.
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=502349#c11
> >
> > Am 12.12.24 um 09:42 schrieb Olivier Lamy:
> > > Agree too.
> > > We can leave them open in Jira with a comment including the link to
> > > the GH issue.
> > > And if the people involved in the issue are really still interested
> > > (few issues might be already fixed but we haven;t done triage because
> > > it's too much work) they can participate in the GH issue.
> > > Then we can have some tooling suh GHA stale [1] with some dedicated
> > > parameters so this will cleanup some issues.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Olivier
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/actions/stale
> > >
> > > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 02:41, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Moving would exactly make things faster. This thread diverged quite a
> > >> bit, but AFAIR the opener of this thread (or the other mail referenced
> > >> by opener of this thread) is exactly about problems _with_ JIRA.
> > >>
> > >> And I also say leave them opened (migrate, leave them as they were
> > >> left in JIRA). Not to close them.
> > >>
> > >> So migration would not be a waste, as JIRA is just an obstacle. In
> > >> fact, this whole thread was started for that purpose (to migrate), and
> > >> not to discuss "what should we do with a huge pile of open issues".
> > >>
> > >> Just migrate all, and leave it alone, as they were left for the last
> 10 years.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> T
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 5:13 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
> > >> <elh...@ibiblio.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Non PMC committees certainly can close jira issues. I do this all
> the time.
> > >>>
> > >>> Also if we want to conserve volunteer time we should not spend time
> moving
> > >>> to GitHub. That’s extra work compared to simply continuing with jira.
> > >>> Leaving a bug open costs nothing until someone is ready to address
> it.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 9:06 AM Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Are you all sure this is how _an open source project having
> > >>>> volunteers-only is supposed to work?_ (maybe better as: "spend it's
> > >>>> scarce resources"?)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> As if we'd all be in some company, working on some company product,
> > >>>> then yes, I agree wholeheartedly, this is "how things should be
> done".
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But in reality, I see nobody out of those 17 active PMCs [1] (as
> > >>>> committers have no karma to close issues AFAIK) who will do this.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Moreover, spending resources on THIS (bookkeeping) than any OTHER
> > >>>> effort is IMO waste.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> For example, who is testing Maven4, that is soon rc-2? As not
> testing
> > >>>> it will cause even more issues, that will result in even more
> > >>>> bookkeeping... a devil's circle.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> IMO, we should "lump" migrate all and just move on, keep this pile
> > >>>> open, and leave it rotting as it has been rotting so far. On GH at
> > >>>> least committers could close issues as well.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1]
> > >>>>
> https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-dist-tool/job/master/site/dist-tool-committers-stats.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> My 5 cents.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>> T
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 2:48 PM Maarten Mulders <
> mthmuld...@apache.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 11/12/2024 12:29, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 5:10 PM Slawomir Jaranowski
> > >>>>>> <s.jaranow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 17:42, Sylwester Lachiewicz
> > >>>>>>> <slachiew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Michale proposed closing all issues that have not been active
> for
> > >>>> more
> > >>>>>>>> than 3 years, so there will be less to maintain/migrate.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Maybe we can limit the age during import.
> > >>>>>>> Maybe we should make a decision for each project.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -10
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> When this was last proposed 5 years ago, I went through Jira and
> made
> > >>>>>> sure that every issue older than the cutoff date had some sort of
> > >>>>>> recent activity so nothing was eligible for automatic closure. I'd
> > >>>>>> rather not have to hack the process like this again. I routinely
> find
> > >>>>>> and sometimes fix bugs that go back to the oldest ones in JIra. If
> > >>>>>> more devs spent more time triaging old bugs, they'd find more too.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I agree with this! From a reporter point-of-view, it is extremely
> > >>>>> demotivating to see a report that you wrote getting ignored for a
> couple
> > >>>>> of years only to be closed for "administration reasons". Don't do
> this.
> > >>>>> It made me stop contributing (by reporting issues) to a few
> projects
> > >>>>> already, because they basically didn't seem to care.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'd also like to encourage people to deliberately close bugs that
> are
> > >>>>>> in fact invalid, unwise, or already fixed. Surprisingly often I
> find a
> > >>>>>> final comment from an active committer or PMC member that lays
> out in
> > >>>>>> detail how the bug has been addressed or why it shouldn't be
> > >>>>>> addressed, but they have not pressed the button to close the bug.
> > >>>>>> Please press the button. However, this needs to be done issue by
> > >>>>>> issue, not as a bulk close of all issues older than some arbitrary
> > >>>>>> date.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Rather do this. If we are sure something is not a bug, take the
> time to
> > >>>>> explain it and then close it. If the reporter thinks we're wrong,
> they
> > >>>>> can always re-open. Closing an issue with solid reasoning is much
> better
> > >>>>> than closing it because it was opened more than X years ago.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Maarten
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>> Elliotte Rusty Harold
> > >>> elh...@ibiblio.org
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
>
>
> --
> Sławomir Jaranowski
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

-- 
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet

Reply via email to