Yes, migration result looks impressive.

We may ignore comments in Jira like
1) author Hudson and text inside "Build success  | Build failed"
2) comments from GH bot about a comment to PR.

Sylwester

[image: hudson]Hudson
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=hudson> added
a comment - 30/Jun/21 17:26
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-393?focusedCommentId=17372076&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17372076>

Build succeeded in Jenkins: Maven » Maven TLP » maven-site » xx-patch-2 #7

See
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-site/job/elharo-patch-2/7/
Edit
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/EditComment!default.jspa?id=13290516&commentId=17372076>
Delete
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/DeleteComment!default.jspa?id=13290516&commentId=17372076>
[image: githubbot]ASF GitHub Bot
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=githubbot> added
a comment - 23/Apr/23 12:58
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNGSITE-393?focusedCommentId=17715440&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17715440>

XXX commented on code in PR #212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/212#discussion_r1174557289

##########
content/apt/guides/mini/guide-http-settings.apt:
##########



pt., 10 sty 2025 o 21:51 Hervé Boutemy <herve.bout...@free.fr> napisał(a):

> Le mercredi 8 janvier 2025, 18:50:59 CET Sandra Parsick a écrit :
> > - ARCHETYPE
> >
> > Migration result:
> > https://github.com/support-and-care/mvn-issues-migration-test-archetype
> > Used migration config:
> >
> https://github.com/support-and-care/jira-to-gh-issues/blob/master/src/main/j
> > ava/io/pivotal/migration/MArchetpeMigrationConfig.java
>
> wow, I'm impressed:
> issues, past closed and still open:
> https://github.com/support-and-care/mvn-issues-migration-test-archetype/issues?q=is%3Aissue+
> past milestones:
> https://github.com/support-and-care/mvn-issues-migration-test-archetype/milestones?state=closed
>
> the only missing aspect I found is when a Jira issue links to a PR, like
> for example https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARCHETYPE-690
> the issue in GH does not display it:
> https://github.com/support-and-care/mvn-issues-migration-test-archetype/issues/647
>
> with that as a reference, I'm much more confident, once this PR link is
> solved
>
> >
> > - MCLEAN
> >
> > Migration result:
> > https://github.com/support-and-care/mvn-issues-migration-test-mclean
> > Used migration config:
> >
> https://github.com/support-and-care/jira-to-gh-issues/blob/master/src/main/j
> > ava/io/pivotal/migration/MCleanMigrationConfig.java
>
> issues migration is like ARCHETYPE
> but  past milestones have not been imported:
> https://github.com/support-and-care/mvn-issues-migration-test-mclean/milestones
>
> is it intentional?
>
> >
> > - MJLINK
> >
> > Migration result:
> > https://github.com/support-and-care/mvn-issues-migration-test-mjlink
> > Used migration config:
> >
> https://github.com/support-and-care/jira-to-gh-issues/blob/master/src/main/j
> > ava/io/pivotal/migration/MJLinkMigrationConfig.java
>
> same result as MCLEAN
>
>
> to me, if we fix missing PR links, and import milestones in MCLEAN and
> MJLINK like it has been done for ARCHETYPE, we can envision wide migration
> after some time to stress test and learn doing releases
>
>
> for tracking progress, if we can, it would be nice to track in Wiki
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/JIRA+to+GitHub+Issues+switching
>
> I'll add columns for tracking data migration, and lines for the few tests
>
>
> And if we could migrate issues for MPOM and MASFRES, it would be nice
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to