Le 2025-03-17 à 17 h 03, Matthias Bünger a écrit :
I'm not an IDE developer, but Maven user and mixing those two, for me
independend things, will make it more confusing than simpler.
The usage of <type> introduced in Maven 4 is already implicitly mixing
the scope. The proposal to replace:
<type>modular-processor</type>
by
<type>modular-jar</type>
<scope>processor</scope>
is an attempt to make that clearer, therefore hopefully clearer for
Maven users. It integrates with the current Maven usage, where <scope>
is already used for saying that a JAR shall be used at compilation time,
or testing time, etc. Saying that a JAR shall be used at annotation
processing time, or javadoc time, is a natural extension. Wouldn't it be
clearer for Maven users than having a "processor" scope implied by the
"processor" suffix of the "modular-processor" type?
Martin
