Le mar. 18 mars 2025 à 10:09, Martin Desruisseaux < martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit :
> Le 2025-03-18 à 09 h 57, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > > > Hmm, processor is not really a scope, more just a qualifier since it > > can be used for compile or test scopes and even worse, often > > processors are provided scope (maybe as a workaround to avoid optional > > but still a thing in current maven picture). > As a workaround to missing compile-only scope I'd say. But that should be fixed, since it has been added to Maven 4. > > > Good point, I forgot that we can put an annotation processor for > compiling the main code, or for compiling the tests. It pretty much > invalidate my proposal. Thanks for pointing that. I will post this > remark on https://github.com/nipafx/module-tooling/ and see if someone > has a counter-argument. > > Martin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet
