User POV here: I find it confusing that I can't tell when people talk about
a Maven module versus a JPMS module. My knee jerk reaction is that Maven 3
should deprecate its use of "module" in favor of "project" (including XML
tags) and Maven 4 only use "module" only for JPMS.

2c,
Gary

On Fri, May 16, 2025, 08:58 Martin Desruisseaux <
martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> wrote:

> Le 2025-05-16 à 14 h 27, Andy Law a écrit :
>
>  >> The most natural way is to do parent/moduleX/src/main/java (and
> siblings)
>  >> and handle the compiler plugin in parent to be jpms specific, no
> technical
>  >> blocker, no maven core change needed
>
>  > This (^^) just seems so natural, I can’t believe that there is any
> discussion about doing it any other way.
>
> One javac execution would compile many Maven subprojects at once. I
> don't think that this is so natural in Maven. Aggregated Javadoc is one
> of the few plugins doing that, and I have read in some JIRA or wiki that
> this is done with a hack not recommended for other plugins.
>
>
> > And I still don’t understand what the <module> sub-element of the
> <source> tag is actually for.
> It map directly to the "module-name" part of the `--module-source-path
> module-name=directory" compiler option. This option is required for
> multi-module compilation.
>
>  From a programmatic point of view, since the plugin uses javax.tools
> interface, it maps directly to the "moduleName" argument of the
> following method, which is invoked by maven-compiler-plugin 4.0.0-beta-3:
>
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/24/docs/api/java.compiler/javax/tools/StandardJavaFileManager.html#setLocationForModule(javax.tools.JavaFileManager.Location,java.lang.String,java.util.Collection)
>
>      Martin
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to