Martin Todorov wrote on 22. Aug 2025 13:14 (GMT +02:00):
> I don't think this is spam. It's a way for developers to get an extra
> stream of income to work on the things they love.
I would not put it into the POM, those are ethernal and immutable and we try to
mini ihr them.
Maybe a separate sponsors.xml as a extra artifact is better - or we get an
Organisation which already runs a Sponsoring program like GitHub to define an
official mapping from coordinatea to projects. Or maybe Sonatype since they
would be able to correlate?
If you want to keep it in the POM a rather neutral attribute like a
@sponsor-search=true flag besides the project url would allow the discovery (on
that page). Then we would have to define that only the latest Version of each
artifact is to be consulted. But not sure how possible a Schema change is?
Gruß
Bernd
—
https://bernd.eckenfels.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
