Maybe one day I'll hit this issue and argue your case Vladimir. At this point it sounds like a storm in a tea cup. Just from the emails, without looking at the examples, that's how it sounds.
I like very much that Maven puts principles first. It seems like you want Maven to break one of its principles to support a fringe use case. Do you agree? Delany On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 at 12:55, Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > >you propose to change it transitively and automatically -> here you > >doomed users > > Romain, it is you who say "you mess up consumers", "it stays a mess", yet > you provide no justification. > > >* today it works for every maven users > > This is false because not only do I provide a clear reproducible test case, > but I quote > a well-known engineer who literally says __Maven has been a showstopper__. > > Chris Povirk: "The situation with Maven has been a showstopper, so if it > were improved, then this would become an interesting discussion for us to > have, time permitting" > > Vladimir >
