>it is in the first messages, just read answered you get The answer can't be in the first messages. There you attacked a wrong example which I later improved to avoid other Maven's traps. I published an updated sample on 16 Oct with "Let me please reiterate the issue with a clearer, minor-version example" message: https://lists.apache.org/thread/q0bn38qtxkv4orx6o9lhtonjcxkbtw5f
None of your 11 messages since then explain the proposal is not relevant, and none of your 11 messages explain why the proposal breaks things. If you still think I missed it, please pin-point the exact message(s): https://lists.apache.org/thread/q0bn38qtxkv4orx6o9lhtonjcxkbtw5f Vladimir
