On man, 2004-11-29 at 16:35, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Howdy,
> 
> There was a post on the user list about some fellow wanting to read in a
> POM so I figured it would be a good opportunity to prepare some examples
> for a maven-model release. 
> 
> What we are doing now is generating the most current version of the
> model is generated without versioning in the package name, so it's
> something like:
> 
> org.apache.maven.model.*
> 
> But we can optionally have versioning in the package name:
> 
> org.apache.maven.model.v301.*
> 
> We have used the versionless variant in the maven-core so that we don't
> have the wrangle version names when we upgrade the model which I like
> but if we are going to make separate utility drops should we release
> them with versioning in the package name? This would be for general use
> like the fellow wants to do on the user list.
> 
> So I'm thinking we can always generate releases with versioning in the
> package name and generate the versionless package name for our use in
> maven-core. I guess that brings up the question of how to name the
> artifacts but that's the general notions. Once we figure this out I
> would like to cut a release of maven-model and let folks try it out.
> 
> Thoughts?

+1 for releasing it.

So the SNAPSHOT version will be without versioned packages and the
released version will be with versions?

-- 
Trygve


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to