On man, 2004-11-29 at 16:35, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Howdy, > > There was a post on the user list about some fellow wanting to read in a > POM so I figured it would be a good opportunity to prepare some examples > for a maven-model release. > > What we are doing now is generating the most current version of the > model is generated without versioning in the package name, so it's > something like: > > org.apache.maven.model.* > > But we can optionally have versioning in the package name: > > org.apache.maven.model.v301.* > > We have used the versionless variant in the maven-core so that we don't > have the wrangle version names when we upgrade the model which I like > but if we are going to make separate utility drops should we release > them with versioning in the package name? This would be for general use > like the fellow wants to do on the user list. > > So I'm thinking we can always generate releases with versioning in the > package name and generate the versionless package name for our use in > maven-core. I guess that brings up the question of how to name the > artifacts but that's the general notions. Once we figure this out I > would like to cut a release of maven-model and let folks try it out. > > Thoughts?
+1 for releasing it. So the SNAPSHOT version will be without versioned packages and the released version will be with versions? -- Trygve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
