Jason van Zyl wrote: > Not being able to use scpexe is a problem as the scp deployment is > broken after the introduction of the directory handling code so maybe > that bit should be rolled back in wagon for the time being until it can > be tested properly. If deployment with scpexe is not viable and the scp > method doesn't work then we definitely have a problem.
It wasn't the directory handling code, it was any number of other changes made in the last wagon release. The previous release also had problems - in fact in my environment the current scp:// works *better* than the previous release. We need to do a lot more work on this, no doubt - but rolling back doesn't solve any problems here. - Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
