I agree. I don't want that we update all closed issues up until now, but only that we take care to define the assignee from now.
Arnaud On 3/18/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as I'm concerned, setting the assignee to yourself when you close > it has been accepted practice for some time (but we don't need to go > back and change all the old ones). > > That way, if it is reopened, the person that closed it can deal with it. > > - Brett > > Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I noticed that we have in maven projects (particularly in m1) a lot of > > issues closed (2033) but without assignee (698). > > I think that it is a good practice to assign the issue to the one who > > closed it (even if it's a Won't fix or duplicated status). > > It's easier to see who closed it (in an issues list for example). We > don't > > have to open the issue to see the change history. > > > > WDYT ? > > > > Arnaud > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
