yeah, I think the idea is definitely to build on this concept and use it for
documentation standards validation. I only meant to say that as of my first
edition, it was still pretty experimental.

:)

-j

On 6/26/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Oh, I was under the impression that this was something that was going to
be used for the new and improved maven documentation.

By the way, epunzalan has made quite a lot of improvements to the plugin
since your first checkin.

--
Dennis Lundberg

John Casey wrote:
> As far as I know, the docck plugin was just a prototype that I was
> using to try to collect some basic information about the sate of
> documentation in the plugins. I don't think much has happened to it
> since then. I like all of your suggestions. It would be nice to
> eventually go even further, and somehow get into diagnosng missing
> docs inside the pages (since some pages might only be stubs).
>
> Clearly, this plugin still has room for improvement! :-)
>
> -j
>
> On 6/26/06, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I've had a look at the docck plugin and I like what I see so far! A
>> couple of questions that popped up along the way:
>>
>> There is a check to make sure there is an index.[apt|xml|...] file
>> present. Shouldn't a lengthy description in the pom be good enough?
>>
>> If a parameter is missing a description, an error is reported stating
>> the mojo goal where the error occurred. As a developer I think it would
>> make more sense to report the class name, but that might not be
>> available.
>>
>> In the check for the scm tag, an error is reported if *all* children
are
>> missing. Shouldn't that be if *any* of the children are missing?
>>
>> --
>> Dennis Lundberg
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


--
Dennis Lundberg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to