Oops wrong one, forget the last email.
On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the issue I am speaking about :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2289
On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I
> can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename
> or I won't get the last version. I remember Brett couple of months ago
> saying this feature wasn't implemented yet. I'll try to find the JIRA
> issue.
>
> This is definitely a showstopper when you don't know about it.
>
> On 9/17/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/17/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Another thing I would like to see fixed is the snapshot apache
> > > repository. Nighlty builds are still deployed using a unique version
> > > identifier. This feature doesn't work and this is why a lot of people
> > > have trouble when it's come to snapshot dependencies.
> >
> > Do you mean *without* a unique version identifier here?
> >
> > This is the 'Maven 2.0.4 will not download a x.x-SNAPSHOT.jar if one
> > is already present in the local repository' problem, correct?
> >
> > It would be nice if it would deploy both a uniquely named version
> > _and_ the x.x.x-SNAPSHOT.jar. The projects I'm involved with have
> > uniqueVersion set to false for that reason.
> >
> > --
> > Wendy
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
