+1 for patching 2.0.6
I have yet to hear a single convincing argument for maintaining broken
behavior. Who cares if people depend on it being broken? Don't upgrade. It's
a defect, not a feature change. Pushing this to a major version is way
overkill.
On 3/16/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree with Brett, this is a 2.1 change, not a 2.0.x
Now as Jochen says, nothing prevents pushing stuff from 2.1 to 2.2 and
get an earlier 2.1, i though we were going to do it anyway.
On 3/16/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Our users must be able to trust point releases are safe upgrades.
> > Let's start moving on putting out 2.1 milestone releases instead.
>
> Agreed. On the other hand, most others seem to consider this change
important.
>
> So, why not simply renaming 2.0.6 to 2.1 and 2.1 to 2.2? Should satisfy
all.
>
> Jochen
>
> --
> Emacs 22 will support MacOS and CygWin. It is not yet decided, whether
> these will be used to run Emacs or the other way round.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Eric Redmond
http://codehaus.org/~eredmond
