On 05/07/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, while separating the base class for reuse I forgot to put that back. For the time being it's still supposed to be there. I've put it back. The intent was the put the abstract class in a separate project so that it could be used by the ITs and by the sample IT project that will serve as the archetype.
Thanks.
At one point to run them all in a reactor, I used them at one point to create IDE files to look at the all as trying to create an IDE project with everything in the ITs is a bit cumbersome.
Right, I guess the expected-to-fail ITs shouldn't be commented-out there then, but in the test suite only. Cheers, Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
