On 5 Jul 07, at 7:40 AM 5 Jul 07, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 05/07/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, while separating the base class for reuse I forgot to put that
back. For the time being it's still supposed to be there. I've put it
back. The intent was the put the abstract class in a separate project
so that it could be used by the ITs and by the sample IT project that
will serve as the archetype.
Thanks.
At one point to run them all in a reactor, I used them at one point
to create IDE files to look at the all as trying to create an IDE
project with everything in the ITs is a bit cumbersome.
Right, I guess the expected-to-fail ITs shouldn't be commented-out
there then, but in the test suite only.
I really just used it in fail-never mode to generate the IDE files.
I'm not so keen on this setup after using it for a few months. It
really is cumbersome trying to setup in an IDE and I don't like that
the test junit is not with the actual test project.
Cheers,
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
