+1 again.
This time I tested it with a clean local repository so I didn't pick
up the previous version I tested. Yet another use case for local
repository segregation - I'll try and post that proposal today.
- Brett
On 30/08/2007, at 9:41 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Here we are again, seems that alpha-6 was referencing alpha-5 jars
that I removed as it was improperly released,... well you know the
story now. I have removed both alpha-5 and alpha-6 and go for alpha-7.
The problems of the previous ones have been fixed, now just cross the
fingers not to make a new one.
The release is staged at
http://people.apache.org/~carlos/staging-repo/
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
