+1 Please can we try exceptionally to note wait for a 72h vote ? All corporate mirrors are now corrupted with those erroneous releases.
Arnaud On 30/08/2007, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 again. > > This time I tested it with a clean local repository so I didn't pick > up the previous version I tested. Yet another use case for local > repository segregation - I'll try and post that proposal today. > > - Brett > > On 30/08/2007, at 9:41 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > > > Here we are again, seems that alpha-6 was referencing alpha-5 jars > > that I removed as it was improperly released,... well you know the > > story now. I have removed both alpha-5 and alpha-6 and go for alpha-7. > > The problems of the previous ones have been fixed, now just cross the > > fingers not to make a new one. > > > > The release is staged at > > http://people.apache.org/~carlos/staging-repo/ > > > > -- > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > > -- The Princess Bride > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- .......................................................... Arnaud HERITIER .......................................................... OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com www.octo.com | blog.octo.com .......................................................... ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org www.apache.org | maven.apache.org ........................................................... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
