...be sure to cast your ballot for MNG-3092:)


ossi petz-2 wrote:
> 
> hallo
> 
> i would like to add one vote to exclude snapshots from version ranges 
> that do not declare them.
> 
> we encounter two problematic situations:
> 
> when using the release plugin we need to clean the local repository from 
> snapshots to make sure no snapshots end up in the build or any assembly.
> 
> the situation is different in active development. somtimes a new version 
> of a dependecy is required. this will be the next snapshot. imagine a 
> range [1.1,2.0). the next snapshot is 1.2-SNAPSHOT. yet this must not be 
> used in releases. its only the developer that needs to use the snapshot. 
> something like [1.1,2.0)-SNAPSHOT could indicate to find the newest 
> version including snapshots.
> 
> as not every deloper should have to locally build/install the module we 
> use a CI server too (clean deploy). if the pom does not tell exaclty 
> which version is ok, we currently have the situation that released 
> versions are downloaded from the repository, but snapshots are only 
> ocnsidered if they are available in the local repository.
> 
> so to make things clear for both the release man and the developer an 
> explicit snaphot 'flag' or statement to specify the version range with 
> or without snapshots would definitly improve the situation.
> 
> currently the builds are not reproducable. they depend on the current 
> state of the local repository.
> 
> 
> regards
> 
> ossi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Version-ranges-and-snapshots-tf4035629s177.html#a13253264
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to