...be sure to cast your ballot for MNG-3092:)
ossi petz-2 wrote: > > hallo > > i would like to add one vote to exclude snapshots from version ranges > that do not declare them. > > we encounter two problematic situations: > > when using the release plugin we need to clean the local repository from > snapshots to make sure no snapshots end up in the build or any assembly. > > the situation is different in active development. somtimes a new version > of a dependecy is required. this will be the next snapshot. imagine a > range [1.1,2.0). the next snapshot is 1.2-SNAPSHOT. yet this must not be > used in releases. its only the developer that needs to use the snapshot. > something like [1.1,2.0)-SNAPSHOT could indicate to find the newest > version including snapshots. > > as not every deloper should have to locally build/install the module we > use a CI server too (clean deploy). if the pom does not tell exaclty > which version is ok, we currently have the situation that released > versions are downloaded from the repository, but snapshots are only > ocnsidered if they are available in the local repository. > > so to make things clear for both the release man and the developer an > explicit snaphot 'flag' or statement to specify the version range with > or without snapshots would definitly improve the situation. > > currently the builds are not reproducable. they depend on the current > state of the local repository. > > > regards > > ossi > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Version-ranges-and-snapshots-tf4035629s177.html#a13253264 Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]