ok. On Jan 28, 2008 2:44 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, that's the type of proposal. It might be better to look for one > from Jakarta since that's closer to Continuum's scenario. And the > description I refer to is entered into the 1st and 3rd paragraph > (though the description can be more than that if desired). It's really > the "mission statement" and scope of the project. > > On 28/01/2008, at 9:40 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > > > Brett, > > > > What do you mean with "proposed project description, and the > > proposal" ? > > I thought to send only a proposal like this one: > > > http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6461007.html > > Do you think to something else? > > If it's only that, I think I'll send it this week, maybe the next. > > > > Emmanuel > > > > On Jan 28, 2008 2:23 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> So, it seems like we are unanimous in favour of Emmanuel as the > >> chair, > >> and by lazy consensus agree to the committer list and initial PMC > >> below :) > >> > >> Emmanuel, will you put together the proposed project description, and > >> then the proposal for us to vote on? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Brett > >> > >> On 05/01/2008, at 10:00 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > >> > >>> So the poll for progressing seems in favour. > >>> > >>> Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we > >>> need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/ > >>> committers, and a chair. > >>> > >>> I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are > >>> there any other nominations? > >>> > >>> I have the current committers list as: > >>> Maria Odea Ching > >>> Joakim Erdfelt > >>> Olivier Lamy > >>> Trygve Laugstol > >>> Jesse McConnell > >>> Brett Porter > >>> Edwin Punzalan > >>> Carlos Sanchez > >>> Wendy Smoak > >>> Rahul Thakur > >>> Emmanuel Venisse > >>> Kenney Westerhof > >>> Andrew Williams > >>> > >>> Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer? > >>> Did I miss anyone? > >>> > >>> The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves > >>> emeritus: > >>> Herve Boutemy > >>> Dan Diephouse > >>> Fabrizio Giustina > >>> Arnaud Heritier > >>> Lukas Theussl > >>> Jason van Zyl > >>> > >>> Anyone on that list that would like to be included? > >>> > >>> Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of > >>> committers. Any objections or opinions about that? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Brett > >>> > >>> On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > >>> > >>>> So, what's next? > >>>> > >>>> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get > >>>> started on it? > >>>> > >>>> From past experience the steps would be: > >>>> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in > >>>> participating in the TLP > >>>> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC > >>>> - vote on sending the resolution to the board > >>>> > >>>> The board next meets in mid-January. > >>>> > >>>> Any thoughts on moving forward with this? > >>>> > >>>> - Brett > >>>> > >>>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level > >>>>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance > >>>>>> to grow. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from > >>>>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from > >>>>>> different companies would be good. > >>>>> > >>>>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least > >>>>> to > >>>>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, > >>>>> let's > >>>>> talk about it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see who else might be interested > >>>>> in > >>>>> joining us in a TLP. > >>>>> > >>>>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is > >>>>> welcome > >>>>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future. > >>>>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked > >>>>> well. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Wendy > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
