Brett, What do you mean with "proposed project description, and the proposal" ? I thought to send only a proposal like this one: http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/6461007.html Do you think to something else? If it's only that, I think I'll send it this week, maybe the next.
Emmanuel On Jan 28, 2008 2:23 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, it seems like we are unanimous in favour of Emmanuel as the chair, > and by lazy consensus agree to the committer list and initial PMC > below :) > > Emmanuel, will you put together the proposed project description, and > then the proposal for us to vote on? > > Cheers, > Brett > > On 05/01/2008, at 10:00 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > > > So the poll for progressing seems in favour. > > > > Before we continue to vote on a proposal to send to the board, we > > need to decide on a description for the project, the initial PMC/ > > committers, and a chair. > > > > I would like to nominate Emmanuel as the chair of the project. Are > > there any other nominations? > > > > I have the current committers list as: > > Maria Odea Ching > > Joakim Erdfelt > > Olivier Lamy > > Trygve Laugstol > > Jesse McConnell > > Brett Porter > > Edwin Punzalan > > Carlos Sanchez > > Wendy Smoak > > Rahul Thakur > > Emmanuel Venisse > > Kenney Westerhof > > Andrew Williams > > > > Anyone on that list that doesn't feel they should be a committer? > > Did I miss anyone? > > > > The following have committed only once, or have declared themselves > > emeritus: > > Herve Boutemy > > Dan Diephouse > > Fabrizio Giustina > > Arnaud Heritier > > Lukas Theussl > > Jason van Zyl > > > > Anyone on that list that would like to be included? > > > > Finally - I propose that the initial PMC be equal to the list of > > committers. Any objections or opinions about that? > > > > Cheers, > > Brett > > > > On 20/12/2007, at 5:42 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > > >> So, what's next? > >> > >> This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get > >> started on it? > >> > >> From past experience the steps would be: > >> - poll the current maven committers to see who is interested in > >> participating in the TLP > >> - draft a resolution with those committers as the initial PMC > >> - vote on sending the resolution to the board > >> > >> The board next meets in mid-January. > >> > >> Any thoughts on moving forward with this? > >> > >> - Brett > >> > >> On 24/09/2007, at 6:59 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: > >> > >>> On 9/21/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> So I think it would be good for Continuum to become a Top Level > >>>> Project at ASF and the continuum community will have more chance > >>>> to grow. > >>>> > >>>> My concern for the moment is we don't have enough committer from > >>>> different companies, To be stable, at least 3 committers from > >>>> different companies would be good. > >>> > >>> It definitely feels like it's time for this to happen, or at least > >>> to > >>> start the process. Assuming there is general agreement here, let's > >>> talk about it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see who else might be interested in > >>> joining us in a TLP. > >>> > >>> IMO, anyone who has access to the code now as part of Maven is > >>> welcome > >>> to come along when it moves out, or at any point in the future. > >>> That's how we handled the Tiles move (from Struts) and it worked > >>> well. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Wendy > >> > > > >
