I know that it is not always clear when to use and attribute and when to use an element; but typically, attributes are used to attach metadata or nonessential information about an element, while subelements are essential parts of the parent element. To me, the groupId, artifactId and version would be essential parts of a dependency element.
Shane On Feb 10, 2008 10:45 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've always wanted to see an attribute based POM, so based on Nicolas' > suggestion I killed some time after waking up early this morning to do > it. > > JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3397 > > Here is a build to try: > http://people.apache.org/~brett/apache-maven-2.0.9-SNAPSHOT-terse-bin.tar.gz > and svn branch: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/branches/maven-2.0.x-terse > > Here are two different files for comparison (it halved the size): > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/archiva/trunk/pom.xml?content-type=text%2Fplain&view=co > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/archiva/trunk/pom-4.1.0.xml?content-type=text%2Fplain&view=co > > What I did is basically convert all the primitive types in the model > to attributes. I think more could be done (flattening lists, doing the > same for plugin configuration elements), but this gets a big win at > least in the dependencies section for minimal work. > > It should be completely backwards compatible. It detects v4.0.0 and > reads it like it used to (then internally converts to the 4.1.0 Java > model). > > Here's some notes on the implementation so far (again, go easy, I just > whipped this up today and it's not production ready): > - I see this as a stepping stone to the final solution. I've said this > before, but I think the POM should separate the build information from > the project metadata (particularly that stored in the repository). I > think we need to take baby steps towards that though. > - this could feasibly be applied to the settings and profile files too. > - I switched to StAX in the process. This is likely going to introduce > some small quirks we need to iron out (like the hack I added to parse > Trygve's name - why did we ever allow that!) I think ideally we'd use > the Xpp3Reader for 4.0.0 and the StaxReader for 4.1.0 for best > compatibility. This would also fix the problem in that I've just > removed the Xpp3Reader and so some plugins may choke. I'm sure the > release plugin won't be happy, for example. > - There is probably a slight performance overhead in reading v4 POMs > since it repopulates the model twice. I haven't measured it but if > it's an issue we could optimise the reader/converter. It also adds > about 200k to the maven-model JAR. > - It is very close to detecting based on namespace so we could enforce > the use of that instead. > > Enjoy! > > Cheers, > Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
