I would just continue to use 2.0.10, that way the release notes at the
end are complete and under a single version.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:11 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1

John, maybe a new version in JIRA to help track issues/regressions for  
the RC cycle would help. Brian ended up doing 9 RCs so I'm sure we'll  
get close to that again. Especially given what look like fundament  
problems with wagon/artifact resolution.

On 16-Jul-08, at 8:12 AM, nicolas de loof wrote:

> Running mvn eclipse:eclipse on my project dump many stacktrace on the
> console :
>
> Downloading:
> http://sai1rennes:8888/archiva/repository/releases/org/jmock/jmock/ 
> 2.4.0/jmock-2.4.0-javadoc.jar
> org.apache.maven.wagon.ResourceDoesNotExistException: Unable to locate
> resource in repository
>        at
> org 
> .apache 
> .maven 
> .wagon 
> .providers 
> .http.LightweightHttpWagon.fillInputData(LightweightHttpWagon.java: 
> 132)
> ...
>
>
> The requested artifact is not present in the repo, but this is not  
> blocker
> and maven 2.0.9 does not dump such errors.
>
>
>
> 2008/7/16 John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> As promised, I've staged the first release candidate for Maven  
>> 2.0.10 here:
>>
>>
>>
http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC1/org/apac
he/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC1/ 
>>
<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC1/org/a
pache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC1/ 
>> >
>>
>> The issues resolved for this release (so far) are here:
>>
>>
>>
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&styleNa
me=Html&version=14112
>>
>> If you look at the Road Map view in JIRA, you'll notice that  
>> MNG-3639 is
>> still open. This is because one of the possible solutions to this  
>> issue -
>> and the only one that the Maven project really has control over -  
>> depends on
>> re-releasing a new version of commons-build-plugin that will depend  
>> on the
>> eventual 2.0.10 version of maven-script-ant.
>>
>> Please, try out this release candidate and let me know what's  
>> broken! Once
>> things stabilize, I'll kick it out to the users to have a go, then  
>> if it's
>> still stable after that (or, whatever RC we find is stable at that  
>> point),
>> I'll call a vote to release. At that point, I'll run a new build to  
>> generate
>> artifacts without the RC# suffix in the version.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -john
>>
>> --
>> John Casey
>> Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
>> Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder,  Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to