It is so much logic that I didn' think about it
What do you think guys ?
It seems to be the good idea ?

Arnaud

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Samuel Le Berrigaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
> if you want to have both you surely could.
>
> Why not adding the 2.0.10 RC1 version to Jira and any issue that is
> found in the RC1 would have its affected version field set to 2.0.10
> RC1 and the fix for to 2.0.10. That you get the nice release notes and
> the metrics of what was found in the RC.
>
> What do you think?
>
> SaM
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fair enough, I was just trying to get some metrics around what surfaces
> > after we call the RC, but we could probably do that if we noted the date
> as
> > a filter.
> >
> > On 16-Jul-08, at 10:34 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> >
> >> I would just continue to use 2.0.10, that way the release notes at the
> >> end are complete and under a single version.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:11 AM
> >> To: Maven Developers List
> >> Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Maven 2.0.10-RC1
> >>
> >> John, maybe a new version in JIRA to help track issues/regressions for
> >> the RC cycle would help. Brian ended up doing 9 RCs so I'm sure we'll
> >> get close to that again. Especially given what look like fundament
> >> problems with wagon/artifact resolution.
> >>
> >> On 16-Jul-08, at 8:12 AM, nicolas de loof wrote:
> >>
> >>> Running mvn eclipse:eclipse on my project dump many stacktrace on the
> >>> console :
> >>>
> >>> Downloading:
> >>> http://sai1rennes:8888/archiva/repository/releases/org/jmock/jmock/
> >>> 2.4.0/jmock-2.4.0-javadoc.jar
> >>> org.apache.maven.wagon.ResourceDoesNotExistException: Unable to locate
> >>> resource in repository
> >>>      at
> >>> org
> >>> .apache
> >>> .maven
> >>> .wagon
> >>> .providers
> >>> .http.LightweightHttpWagon.fillInputData(LightweightHttpWagon.java:
> >>> 132)
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The requested artifact is not present in the repo, but this is not
> >>> blocker
> >>> and maven 2.0.9 does not dump such errors.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2008/7/16 John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi again,
> >>>>
> >>>> As promised, I've staged the first release candidate for Maven
> >>>> 2.0.10 here:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC1/org/apac<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC1/org/apac>
> >> he/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC1/
> >>>>
> >> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Ejdcasey/stage/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC1/org/a
> >> pache/maven/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC1/
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The issues resolved for this release (so far) are here:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&styleNa
> >> me=Html&version=14112
> >>>>
> >>>> If you look at the Road Map view in JIRA, you'll notice that
> >>>> MNG-3639 is
> >>>> still open. This is because one of the possible solutions to this
> >>>> issue -
> >>>> and the only one that the Maven project really has control over -
> >>>> depends on
> >>>> re-releasing a new version of commons-build-plugin that will depend
> >>>> on the
> >>>> eventual 2.0.10 version of maven-script-ant.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please, try out this release candidate and let me know what's
> >>>> broken! Once
> >>>> things stabilize, I'll kick it out to the users to have a go, then
> >>>> if it's
> >>>> still stable after that (or, whatever RC we find is stable at that
> >>>> point),
> >>>> I'll call a vote to release. At that point, I'll run a new build to
> >>>> generate
> >>>> artifacts without the RC# suffix in the version.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> -john
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> John Casey
> >>>> Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
> >>>> Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp/
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >> Jason van Zyl
> >> Founder,  Apache Maven
> >> jason at sonatype dot com
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > Jason van Zyl
> > Founder,  Apache Maven
> > jason at sonatype dot com
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > We all have problems. How we deal with them is a measure of our worth.
> >
> >  -- Unknown
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Samuel Le Berrigaud
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to