I'm seeing the same problem - the build is dying much earlier. For
Archiva, this is in archiva-database, while 2.0.9 died in archiva-
webapp.
RC6 was the last version to get the whole way through, so it looks
like a change in RC7.
Cheers,
Brett
On 19/08/2008, at 12:07 PM, John Casey wrote:
What I'm starting to notice on this end is that it uses a bit more
memory - probably in the middle of the build - than 2.0.9. This is
evident in the max VM size at the end of the build, more than the
final memory consumption. It seems that leaving the maven build at
the default 64M VM size, it takes a long time to build. I think
having a smaller max VM size may be causing it to thrash the GC, but
that's just a guess.
I had attributed this memory increase to the change in the assembly
plugin version, but maybe it has more to do with the changes to the
lifecycle executor to fix detection of reactorProject/session
parameter usage (which is used to determine whether Maven really
needs to calculate the concrete state for each project in the
reactor for that plugin's execution).
I'll take a closer look; is the CXF build where this number comes
from?
-john
Daniel Kulp wrote:
John,
The performance issue is back:
For CXF/tunk:
mvn install -Pdeploy,everything,nochecks
2.0.9:
Total time: 8 minutes 35 seconds
2.0.10-RC9:
Total time: 19 minutes
Dan
On Monday 18 August 2008 2:48:36 pm John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
As you're probably aware, we've been working for some time to
stabilize
Maven for the 2.0.10 release. After quite a bit of testing in the
development community - and 8 release candidates - it looks like we
finally have a candidate that is free of regressions and stable.
You can
download it here:
http://people.apache.org/~jdcasey/apache-maven/2.0.10-RC9/org/apache/maven/
apache-maven/2.0.10-RC9
While it does seem that all of our builds are happy with the new
release
candidate, we'd like to get your feedback on it before we finalize
things. This will help us respond to any regressions or critical
issues
we may have missed BEFORE we do the release, instead of having to
put up
with major flaws for another release cycle.
Please, if you have the time, take 2.0.10-RC9 for a spin and tell us
what you think!
Thanks,
-john
P.S. To see the list of issues that were closed for this release (so
far), check out:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&styleName=
Html&version=14112
--
John Casey
Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]