Would not it be better to move wagons and anything else not intended to
be visible by plugins into a separate classloader?
Brett Porter wrote:
/me cheers
Yep, go for it.
This will also mean producing shaded versions of the wagons though I
think, or creating a shaded "built-in wagons" JAR, to prevent some of
their dependencies being forced on plugins. The ITs for MNG-3581/3599
might pick this up, but it would be worth an extra IT to verify.
Cheers,
Brett
On 23/09/2008, at 3:00 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I made the uber jar and I think it was a mistake. It's a complete PITA
to swap in new jars and test and the shading can work on the JARs
necessary.
I would like to remove the uber jar in 2.1 and do it on the 2.2 branch
as well.
Any objections?
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
A party which is not afraid of letting culture,
business, and welfare go to ruin completely can
be omnipotent for a while.
-- Jakob Burckhardt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
