I agree but I find the first RC was out quickly without giving the time to
review the bugs we wanted to fix in this version.
It's not a big problem. We'll fix it in the .11. I'm preparing an IT.

Arnaud

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Brian Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Arnaud, the idea is to limit the scope to new regressions once we start an
> RC. Otherwise we would spin in circles forever.
>
> --Brian (mobile)
>
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2008, at 2:04 AM, "Arnaud HERITIER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>  ok brett,
>>
>> I'll try to create a testcase without seam.
>>
>> Even if we try to improve the quality of our releases I think we have to
>> fix
>> any issue that we find in 2.0.x in a bug fix and not only bugs we
>> introduced
>> in a bug fix release.
>>
>> From the beginning we should have apply only bugs fixes on 2.0.x and put
>> changes (mirrors, ..) or new features (import scope, ...) in a new minor
>> release (2.x).
>>
>> That's why I didn't check on which version it was a regression. It's just
>> a
>> bug in 2.0.x.
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>> I'll submit the IT in few days.
>>
>> Arnaud
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:46 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Arnaud,
>>>
>>> The issue didn't make it clear that this is actually a regression from
>>> 2.0.8 -> 2.0.9. It'd be helpful to have an IT for this that doesn't rely
>>> on Seam to be able to get it fixed. I'd be a little reluctant to make a
>>> dep
>>> change this far along in 2.0.10, since it's not a regression from 2.0.9
>>> ->
>>> 2.0.10, but it should certainly be fixed either for 2.0.10 or early
>>> 2.0.11.
>>>
>>> - Brett
>>>
>>> On 29/10/2008, at 6:42 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>>>
>>> MNG-3775 <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3775> is also more than
>>>
>>>>
>>>> annoying
>>>> We added a testcase and I can try to create an IT if necessary.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Arnaud
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please try it out and see if we have any remaining regressions over
>>>>>
>>>>>  2.0.9.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  It's not a regression but would nicely fit our efforts to stabilize
>>>>> things:
>>>>> While investigating why 2.0.10-RC1 passed the IT MNG-3599 for Brett but
>>>>> not
>>>>> for me, I discovered MNG-3805. It's just another issue about using
>>>>> LinkedHashSet/-Map vs. HashSet/-Map. I have by now both a proposed
>>>>> patch
>>>>> and
>>>>> the IT available.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, if somebody considers it sensible, we could additionally fix
>>>>> - MNG-3805
>>>>> - MNG-3424
>>>>> - MNG-3599
>>>>> for 2.0.10.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Benjamin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ..........................................................
>>>> Arnaud HERITIER
>>>> ..........................................................
>>>> OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
>>>> www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
>>>> ..........................................................
>>>> ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
>>>> www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
>>>> ...........................................................
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Brett Porter
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ..........................................................
>> Arnaud HERITIER
>> ..........................................................
>> OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
>> www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
>> ..........................................................
>> ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
>> www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
>> ...........................................................
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
..........................................................
Arnaud HERITIER
..........................................................
OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
..........................................................
ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
...........................................................

Reply via email to