Ian Robertson schrieb: > > I would propose that the semantics change to "Of the overlapping ranges, the > *lowest* soft requirement is the version to be used." Consequently, new > releases of a project would not change builds of other projects depending on > it (assuming that version numbers increase instead of decrease with each > release). This would negatively impact those projects wanting to live on the > "bleeding edge", but benefit projects wanting repeatable builds. >
Could you please give an example showing exactly the proposed change. Choosing a lower version over a higher version breaks compatibility since higher versions tend to have evolved and may have features a lower version does not provide, assuming that higher versions are backwards compatible to lower versions. -- Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
