Christian Schulte schrieb: > Stephen Connolly schrieb: >> What I'm thinking is that if we had some metadata associated with the >> groupId, it could specify what the version comparison rule is for that >> groupId (and all it's child groupIds)... > > It would be very cool to have some general purpose grouplevel metadata! > Various things come to mind. Public keys, extensible general purpose > grouplevel indexing, group relocation, group depraction, access control > etc. Lots of usecases. So when modeling, lots of requirements to > collect. Could be as complex as the pom itself, could be as simple as > > <group> > <file id="well-known-identifier" > mime-type="text/xml" > url="version-comparison-metadata.xml"/> > > <file id="well-known-identifier" > mime-type="application/x-x509-ca-cert" > url="ca.crt"/> > > <file id="well-known-identifier" > mime-type="image/jpeg" > url="logo.jpg"/> > > ... > </group> > > With URLs relative to the groupid location or even absolute pointing to > some resource outside the repository, but publicly accessible, or not. >
There currently is no possibility for something like 'artifactGroup.getArtifacts()', is there ? -- Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
