> > >> > Bumping the Java requirement doesn't feel like a maintenance release IMHO. > Therefore, shouldn't we bump the Maven version to 2.2 as well and rename the > branch or create a new one? > > +1 It's a too big change for a bug fix release Arnaud
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - /maven/components/branches/mav... Benjamin Bentmann
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - /maven/components/branche... Arnaud HERITIER
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - /maven/components/bra... Brett Porter
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - /maven/components... Arnaud HERITIER
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - /maven/components... John Casey
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - /maven/compon... Brett Porter
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - /maven/compon... Benjamin Bentmann
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - /maven/c... Dennis Lundberg
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - /mav... Arnaud HERITIER
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - ... John Casey
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - /mav... John Casey
- Re: svn commit: r767207 - ... Benjamin Bentmann
