+1

Ralph
On Apr 26, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Brian Fox wrote:

Anyone else? We have just two votes so far.

On 4/20/2009 11:05 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Time to release the updated parent poms:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/apache-staging-011/org/apache/apache/6/apache-6.pom

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-012/org/apache/maven/maven-parent/12/maven-parent-12.pom

The changes were described in a previous thread:
"We currently have some expectations about what artifacts are created for apache builds, such as javadocs and source jars, and specifically artifact signatures. Currently each project must configure the current release profile in their own top level pom. This raises the bar of entry for new projects and creates more work for us to help them get it sorted out.

I'd like to take the maven release profile and release plugin config and push it up to the apache pom to make it consistent and easy for all apache projects to produce proper releases. I think to do it and avoid conflicts with any existing profiles, I would change the profile name from "release" to "apache-release" and activate that by default. Does anyone see any downsides to this?"

In addition to moving the profile, I pulled up the pluginManagement and the default source encoding. I think if these things are best practices for the Maven project, they can be default best practices for any Apache project as well.

Vote is open for 72hrs:

+1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to