Are we sure we don't want a 2.1.1 to just get rid of some regressions? 2.2.0 sounds good with the reasons stated, but it just seems goofy 2.1.0 would have no point release after that.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Benjamin Bentmann <[email protected]> wrote: > John Casey wrote: > >> So, I propose the following: we should do a very tightly focused 2.2.0 >> release next, and forget 2.1.1. > > +1 > > > Benjamin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
