Can't we create a 2.1.1 branch only if required by some blocker issue ? 2009/4/30 Paul Benedict <[email protected]>
> Are we sure we don't want a 2.1.1 to just get rid of some regressions? > 2.2.0 sounds good with the reasons stated, but it just seems goofy > 2.1.0 would have no point release after that. > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Benjamin Bentmann > <[email protected]> wrote: > > John Casey wrote: > > > >> So, I propose the following: we should do a very tightly focused 2.2.0 > >> release next, and forget 2.1.1. > > > > +1 > > > > > > Benjamin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
