On 16/11/2009, at 7:14 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html > > The performance framework is EPL, which is not an authorized license > according to our documentation. You mean org.eclipse.test.performance here? > We are likely to make some modifications, if we haven't already, and so it's > easier not to put it here. If we made anything more then minimal changes we > have to back it out. You mean http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/org.eclipse.test.performance.patch here? Everything else in http://svn.sonatype.org/m2eclipse/sandbox/trunk/maven-performance-tests/ is under ALv2? If that is the case, can't we commit the patch & EPL'd binary to the SVN repo here (or put the binary in a Maven repository), and submit the patches upstream in the hope that we only need to use the official Eclipse binary down the track? This shouldn't be a problem in general - we aren't checking in any EPL sources. And further, we aren't intending to redistribute the performance framework as a release anyway. Cheers, Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
